| || ||
The Incarnation | Frank Sheed | From A
Map of Life
The human race then had broken its right relation of friendship with God:
men had lost the way because they had lost the life (without which the way
cannot be followed) and the truth without which the way cannot even be known.
To such a world Christ, who had come to make all things new, said, "I am
the Way, the Truth and the Life." In those three wordsway, truth,
lifeChrist related Himself quite precisely to what man had lost: as
precisely as a key fits a lock. In the precision of that threefold relation,
we are apt to overlook the strangest word in the phrasethe word "am."
Men needed truth and life: what they might have expected was one who would
say "I have the truth and the life": what they found was one who said "I
am the truth and the life." This strange word forces us to a new mode of
approach. If a man claims to have what we want, we must study what he has.
If a man claims to be what we want, we must study what he is. With any other
teacher the truth he has is our primary concernthe teacher himself
is of no importance save as the bearer of truth, and his work is done when
he has given it. With Christ, the teacher is primary: He cannot simply give
us the truth and the life, and then have done with us. He can only give
us Himself, for He is both. This point must be insisted on, not as a figure
of speech, but as a strict fact. It is a map we are making, not a poem;
and what is now being said, mysterious as it is, is strictly and literally
true. Our study of the road of life has brought us to an examination of
truth and life: we cannot understand the road if we do not understand them.
But if Christ is the truth, then we must understand Him: if He is the life,
then He must live in us.
Obviously, then, our map-making cannot progress till we are clear about
Who and what Christ is, because the road we are to travel depends even more
on what He is than on what He did.
THE TWO NATURES OF CHRIST
Christ is God-made-man: that is He is truly God and He is truly man. He
is Godwith the nature of God: He took to Himself and made His own
a complete human naturea real human body and a real human soul. He
is, then, one personGodwith two naturesdivine and human.
Nor is all this mere abstract matter, of no real concern to us. Everything
in our life is bound up with the one person and the two natures of Christ.
We must grasp this central luminous fact, or everything remains in darkness.
The distinction between person and nature is not some deep and hidden thing
to which philosophy only comes after centuries of study. It is, on the contrary,
a distinction so obvious that the smallest child who can talk at all makes
it automatically. If in the half-light he sees a vague outline that might
be anything, he asks "What is that?" If, on the other hand, he can see that
it is a human being, but cannot distinguish or does not recognize the features,
he asks "Who is that?" The distinction between what and who is the distinction
between nature and person. Of every man the two questionswhat is he?
and who is he?can be answered. Every man, in other words, is both
a nature and a person. Into my every action, nature and person enter. For
instance I speak. I, the person, speak. But I am able to speak only because
I am a man, because it is of my nature to speak. I discover that there are
all sorts of things I can do: and all sorts of things I cannot do. My nature
decides. I can think, speak, walk: these actions go with the nature of man,
which I have. I cannot fly, for this goes with the nature of a bird, which
I have not.
My nature, then, decides what I can do: it may be thought of as settling
the sphere of action possible to me. According to my nature, I can act:
apart from it, I cannot. But my nature does not do these thingsI,
the person, do them. It is not my nature that speaks, walks, thinks: it
is I, the person.
A man may then be thought of as a personwho actsand a naturewhich
decides the field in which he acts. In man there is simply one nature to
one person. In Christ there are two natures to one person: and our minds
used to the one-nature-to-one-person state of man tend to cry out that there
is a contradiction in the idea of two natures to one person.
But once it has been grasped that "person" and "nature" are not identical
in meaning: once it has been grasped that the person acts and the nature
is that principle in him which decides his sphere of action, then we see
that mysterious as Our Lord's person and nature may be, there is no contradiction.
God the Son, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, assumedtook
to Himselfa human nature: made it His own: not simply as something
which He could use as a convenient sphere to act in, but really as His own:
just as our nature is our own. In us the relation of person and nature is
such that not merely do we say "I have a human nature" (as we might say
"I have an umbrella") but person and nature are so fused in one concrete
reality that we say "I am a man." So God the Son can say not only "I am
God with a human nature to act in" but in the most absolute fullness of
meaning He can say "I am man." He does not simply act as man: He is manas
truly man as we.
This one person has two spheres of action: Christ our Lord could act either
in His nature as God or in His nature as man. Remember the principle stated
a few paragraphs back, that it is not the nature that acts, but the person.
Therefore, whether He was acting in His divine nature or in His human nature,
it was always the person who acted: and there was only the one personGod.
Then this is the position. Christ is God: therefore whatever Christ did,
God did. When Christ acted in His divine nature (as when He raised the dead
to life) it was God who did it: when Christ acted in His human nature (as
when He was born, suffered and died) it was God who did it: God was born,
God suffered, God died. For it is the person who acts: and Christ is God.
The next paragraph must be read with the closest attention or the map will
not be properly understood.
Because Christ was God and Man, He was able to effect the reconciliation
of God and man. The human race had broken the first relationship of oneness
by sin: and of itself the human race with all its imperfections on it could
make no offering to God in reparation for its sin. Literally the human race
could not make reparation. Yet for the human act of rebellion, a human act
of atonement was required: for the sin of human nature, only an act of human
nature could satisfyyet this act of human nature man could not perform.
Christ was God and Man. The acts He performs in His human nature were truly
human acts: yet because every action is of the person, they were acts of
God, whose every act is of infinite value: Christ could make the necessary
reparation. That particular action of His human nature which Christ chose
as an offering-in-reparationa sacrificewas His death: at the
age of thirty-three He was crucified upon Calvary.
This was the atonement. By it the breach between God and the human race
was closed. The race was redeemed from that condition of separation from
God into which the sin of Adam, the representative man, had plunged it.
Heaven, the final and eternal union of God and man, was once more possible
to man. For even the holiest man of the time between Adam's fall and Christ's
death was still a member of the human race, a member of the race that had
lost oneness with God, and as such debarred from heaven. But, by this re-making
of the oneness, not only was Lifethe Supernatural Lifeset flowing
with new richness for the elevation of man's soul: but that Life could now
in heaven receive the full and complete flowering which before Calvary was
impossible to it.
Christ had come "to save His people from their sins": He had come that man
"might have life and have it more abundantly." These two purposes are in
reality the same purposethe effect of sin is the destruction of the
Supernatural Life: a soul in sin is a soul that lacks the Supernatural Life:
sin is removed by the pouring into the soul of that life-as darkness is
removed by the turning on of the light. So far, then, for the first part
of Christ's mission: He had reconciled the human race to God: He had brought
back the rich store of Supernatural Life.
CHRIST AS TEACHER
There remains to be considered the other need of manTruth. As we have
seen this involves as a minimum that man shall be taught the purpose of
his existence and the laws by which he must live. Christ taught this necessary
minimum-and much more. The laws will be discussed in detail in Chapters
IX and X: here notice only two things:
(a) He took the ten commandments given to the chosen people of Israel by
God some fifteen hundred years beforemost of them beginning with "Thou
shalt not" and summed them up into two, both beginning "Thou shalt": for
the first three commandments, which set out our duty to God, He expressed
concisely as "Thou shalt love God"; and the remaining seven, which set out
our duty to our neighbour, He expressed equally concisely as "Thou shalt
love thy neighbour." In other words, all the commandments lie implicit in
this twofold love;
(b) Just as the commandments are summarized and made positive, so they are
traced back from external conduct to the internal root of conduct, from
actions (commanded or prohibited) to lovea state of the soul: and
sins of the mindor heart-or intention become as serious as sins of
the exterior action: the yielding of the mind to lust not only is as bad
as adultery, it is adultery; the yielding of the mind to murder not only
is as bad as murder, it is murder. The essence of sin is now clearit
is the soul of man twisting itself out of the right relation to God. That
is sin. Nothing else is. And the laws which express the right relation are
all forms of love.
So much, for the moment, for the laws to be obeyed. On the truths to be
believedincluding the minimum requirement of the purpose of man's
existence, of what was in the mind of God when He made manChrist is
equally revealing and equally fundamental. The purpose of man's existence
is to come to God. This includes a multitude of things, but principally,
because man is an intelligent being, it involves some revelation of the
nature of God: the more man knows of his goal, the more likely he is to
make for it effectively. Thus He revealed to man that in the divine nature
are three personsGod the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost:
that He Himself was the Second Person, God the Son. Of this supreme mystery
of the Trinity and of mystery in general something will be said in Chapter
VIII. Here we must consider not the revelation of God that our Lord gave
by teaching, but the revelation of God that Our Lord gave simply by being.
Mankind has never been without means of acquiring some knowledge of God:
in the Universe we have God's work before our eyes and by examining any
work we can learn something of the workman. But, in practical fact, not
much. We can learn more about a boilermaker by five minutes' face-to-face
conversation with him than by five years' examination of the boiler he has
made. Similarly, though we learn many things about God from contemplating
the Universe He has made, there is something a little remote and shadowy
about such knowledge. And this for the further reason that we can know nothing
of what is involved in making a universe. But if we could see Godnot
making a universebut obeying His mother, feeling hunger, paying taxes,
receiving insult: then instantly we should be on our own ground. For all
these things we have done ourselves. Now because Christ was God, all these
things are there for men to see. God did obey His mother, suffer hunger,
pay taxes, receive insult. Christ, then, in a sense, is God translating
Himself into our nature. And the difference between God acting in His own
nature and God acting in ours is as great as the difference between a man
talking in his own language and the same man talking in ours. For in the
first case such a man can convey some things to usbut rather by signs
than speechand we catch what he has to say haltingly and uncertainly:
in the second case he really speaks to us and we know what he wants to communicate.
Thus the fact that Christ is God takes on a new significance. As we first
used it, it was as a fact about Christ: now we see it as an even more revealing
fact about God. Christacting in our nature, which He had made Hiswe
can study and make our own: to realize that the knowledge thus acquired
of Christ is true of God is altogether revolutionary. For only by learning
that Christ is Love have men learnt that God is love: and that is almost
the greatest gift of Christianity to the world.
Our Lord's life upon earth seems to have been especially devised with the
purpose of bringing man into the closest possible intimacy with God. The
general outline of His life is sufficiently well known. He was born of a
virgin, the wife of a carpenter of Nazareth, during the reign of the Roman
Emperor, Augustus. Then, with the exception of one strange incident when
he was aged twelve, there is silence till he reached the age of thirty.
Then came three years of teaching and the working of miracles. The leaders
of the Jewish people turned against Him and more or less forced the Roman
Governor to have Him executed. He was nailed to a cross and after three
hours He died. On the third day He rose again from the dead, and after forty
days He ascended into the heavens and vanished from the eyes of men. Within
this framework there are two rich streams of human contact, a greater and
a less. The greater, naturally enough, was through His mother. From her
He had drawn His human body: if man may call Him brother, it is solely through
her. She lived with Him throughout the years before His public life began:
to please her He worked a miracle at Cana and began His public ministry
sooner than He had meant. When He died, He committed her to the care of
John, the follower that He loved best: and this apostle, who became as a
son to her, later wrote a gospel, in which from the beginning men have found
a deeper insight into Our Lord than in any other. It would have been strange
had it been otherwiseif any man could have lived in such intimacy
with the mother of Christ and had no richness to show for it.
The second stream was through His apostlesthe men He gathered round
Him, and prepared with especial care as the instruments for the spread of
His kingdom among men. It is important to grasp here the mode of Christ's
revelation of His own Godhead. Obviously had He begun with the statement
that He was God, the road would have been closed. Some would have disbelieved
Him: those who believed would have been far too overcome with terror at
the majesty of God and their own sinfulness to make any progress in human
intimacy with Him. What actually happened was that these men came to know
Him as men can only know one in whose company they constantly are, in every
variety of circumstance.
Graduallyor rather with sudden bursts forward followed by fallings
awaythey came to the feeling that He must be God and ultimately to
the full knowledge that He was. But before that time they had come to know
Him: to know Him as a friend and not only as a master: from men who had
companioned with Christ for three years, even the discovery that He was
God could not take away the certainty that He was love: so that God, too,
must be love. The fruit of our Lady's thirty years with Christ and the apostles'
three years with Him, enshrined in part in the gospels, is the very essence
of the Christian tradition, woven into the very fabric of the Christian
If we compare the attitude to God of the most pious pagans with that of
the Christian the gulf is enormous. In the Christian attitude there is a
warm personal devotion not to be found elsewhere. For other men have seen
the Works of God, but Christians have seen God.
These two truths, God is love and Law is love, are the two specifically
Christian truths, unknown outside the Christian revelation. It is difficult
to say which idea would have come upon the world with a greater shock. For
outside Christianity, God has seemed to be a master or even a tyrant, but
never love: and as a consequence law has seemed to be force, or even cruelty,
but never love. And even inside Christianity it is hard to hold, continuous
and never dimmed, the idea of God and law as love: for there come moments
when another face seems to be presented to us; feeling or no feeling, we
know. And we know because Christ was God.
Here then in outline is God's answer to man's need. The human race needed
first to be reunited to God (that Heaven might once more be open to it),
and second it needed the Life and the Truth by which it might attain Heaven
once salvation became a possibility. Christ our LordGod-made-man-made
the act of reparation that reunited the human race with God and so made
Heaven a possibility, brought back for man the rich profusion of the Supernatural
Life, and revealed to man not only the necessary truths of purpose and law
but a great store of truth besides.
Related IgnatiusInsight.com Articles on Advent and Christmas:
What In Christmas Season Grows: On the Days Leading Up to
the Nativity of the Lord | Fr. James V. Schall, S.J.
Turn Your Hearts! | A Homily for the Second Sunday
of Advent | Fr. Kenneth Baker, S.J.
The Perfect Faith of the Blessed Virgin | Carl E. Olson
Come, Lord Jesus! The Meaning of Advent | Fr. Kenneth Baker, S.J.
Mary Immaculate | Fr. Kenneth Baker, S.J.
Archbishop Fulton Sheen on Advent | From Through the Year
With Fulton Sheen
Mary's Gift of Self Points the Way | Carl E. Olson
Immaculate Mary, Matchless in Grace | John Saward
Mary | The Introduction to Mary in the Middle Ages | by Luigi Gambero
The Mystery Made Present To Us | Fr. Alfred Delp, S.J.
Remembering Father Alfred Delp, S.J., Priest and Martyr |
A Conversation with Father Karl Adolf Kreuser, S.J.
Assumed Into Mother's Arms | Carl E. Olson
Contemplates the Mother | Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis
"Born of the Virgin Mary" | Paul Claudel
The Old Testament
and the Messianic Hope | Thomas Storck
of Contradiction, Season of Redemption | Fr. James V. Schall, S.J.
The God in the
Cave | G.K. Chesterton
Sheed (1897-1981) was an Australian of Irish descent. A law student,
he graduated from Sydney University in Arts and Law, then moved in 1926,
with his wife Maisie Ward, to London. There they founded the well-known
Catholic publishing house of Sheed & Ward in 1926, which published some
of the finest Catholic literature of the first half of the twentieth century.
Known for his sharp mind and clarity of expression, Sheed became one of
the most famous Catholic apologists of the century. He was an outstanding
street-corner speaker who popularized the Catholic Evidence Guild in both
England and America (where he later resided). In 1957 he received a doctorate
of Sacred Theology honoris causa authorized by the Sacred Congregation
of Seminaries and Universities in Rome.
Although he was a cradle Catholic, Sheed was a central figure in what he
called the "Catholic Intellectual Revival," an influential and
loosely knit group of converts to the Catholic Faith, including authors
such as G.K. Chesterton, Evelyn
Waugh, Arnold Lunn, and Ronald Knox.
Sheed wrote several books, the best known being Theology
and Sanity, A
Map of Life, Theology for Beginners and To
Know Christ Jesus. He and Maise also compiled the Catholic Evidence
Training Outlines, which included his notes for training outdoor speakers
and apologists and is still a valuable tool for Catholic apologists and
catechists (and is available through the Catholic Evidence Guild).
For more about Sheed, visit his IgnatiusInsight.com
the Insight Scoop Blog and read the latest posts and comments by
IgnatiusInsight.com staff and readers about current events, controversies,
and news in the Church!
| || || |