SEARCH
  About Ignatius Insight
  Who We Are
  Author Pages
  Pope Benedict XVI/Cardinal Ratzinger
  Pope John Paul II/ Karol Wojtyla
  Rev. Louis Bouyer
  G.K. Chesterton
  Fr. Thomas Dubay
  Mother Mary Francis
  Fr. Benedict Groeschel
  Thomas Howard
  Karl Keating
  Msgr Ronald Knox
  Peter Kreeft
  Fr. Henri de Lubac, SJ
  Michael O'Brien
  Joseph Pearce
  Josef Pieper
  Richard Purtill
  Steve Ray
  Christoph Cardinal Schönborn, OP
  Fr. James V. Schall, SJ
  Frank Sheed
  Fr. Hans Urs von Balthasar
  Adrienne von Speyr
  Louis de Wohl
  Books
  Magazines
  Catholic World Report
  H&P Review
Article Archives
  Jan 2006-Present
  July-Dec 2005
  Apr-Jun 2005
  Jan-Mar 2005
  Nov-Dec 2004
  June-Oct 2004
Interviews
  Press Room
  Music
  Videos
  Software
  Sacred Art
  Religious Ed
Resources
  Request Catalog
  Web Specials
   
  Ignatius Press
  History
  Staff
  Specials
  Contact
   
  Noteworthy News
  Catholic World News
  EWTN News
  Vatican News
  Catholic News Agency
  ZENIT
  Catholic News
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 


Abstinence education programsare medically accurate. But they violate the sacred dogma of the sex ed establishment.



Let's play a word association game.  I'll write a phrase, and you observe what other word or phrase first comes to your mind. 

The phrase is "abstinence education."

So what did you think of?  If the first words that came to your mind were "medically inaccurate" or something to that effect, then Congressman Henry Waxman has done his job well.

Why would you associate "abstinence education" with "medically inaccurate"?  Because, in the past days and week, those two terms have been linked in news stories, talk show discussions, and that annoying little ticker that runs along the bottom of the screen on every 24 hour cable news network.

All thanks to Congressman Henry Waxman.

Mr. Waxman, the Democratic congressional representative from West Hollywood, California, recently released a "report" on abstinence education.  (You'll see soon why I put the word "report" in quotation marks.)  Hearing news stories about this "report" could plant doubts in even the most fervent supporter of abstinence education.  According to Waxman, these programs are literally riddled with inaccurate medical information and absurd gender stereotypes.  Eleven out of the 13 programs reviewed, he says, contained significant errors and problems.

I was a little worried - until I read the actual report.

First of all, this is not a "congressional report" reviewed or approved by any committee of Congress.  It was written by the very partisan staff of a very partisan Congressman.  Mr. Waxman is one of the most vocal proponents of explicit, contraceptive-based sex education on Capital Hill.  It is apparent from the very first page of this document that it is not an even-handed, objective attempt to evaluate programs.  It is an angry, partisan smear job.

Waxman claims that no evidence exists that abstinence education works.  I found this an astonishing complaint, given that, according to the Heritage Foundation, at least ten studies exist to date demonstrating the effectiveness of abstinence education, and four of these were published in peer-reviewed journals.  In fact, the April 2003 edition of Adolescent and Family Health found that increased abstinence was the major cause of the decline in teen pregnancy and birth rates.

Waxman's complaints about these programs seem to fall into three categories:  "inaccurate information" about abortion, about condoms, and about gender roles.  As far as I can tell, most of the passages in dispute don't violate the facts so much as they violate the "orthodoxy" of the comprehensive sex-education movement.  For instance, Waxman reports that one program states as fact that the union of the sperm and egg constitutes the beginning of a new human life.  This, he claims, is a "religious view" and not a scientific fact. 

Really?  It's human.  It's living.  It didn't exist before.  What scientist would disagree with that? 

Waxman also objects to these programs' information about abortion - specifically, the increased risks of sterility and suicide.  This I found particularly astonishing.  The Elliott Institute (www.afterabortion.info), among others, has done a very thorough job documenting the consequences women suffer as a result of abortion.  Waxman blithely ignores this evidence, instead relying solely on a 2003 Obstetrics textbook which claims that abortion has no long-term negative impact on women.

Perhaps Mr. Waxman should conduct a review of the scientific accuracy of medical textbooks.

In terms of the myriad other "problems" reported in these programs, I found in my research that they were either quotes taken out of context, statistics which were due to be updated, typographical errors or, in most cases, facts which were consistent with the current data but at odds with the prevailing orthodoxy of the left.

Worse yet is the information Waxman's report omitted.  Sexual activity takes a huge toll on our teenagers.  Aside from the obvious pregnancy and disease rates, sexually active teens experience higher rates or drug use, depression and suicide facts which are ignored in these so-called "comprehensive" sex education programs.

In fact, why hasn't Mr. Waxman done a comprehensive review of the "comprehensive" programs?  Why doesn't he shine the light of medical and scientific truth on the curricula he champions in Congress?  Why did he choose to review only abstinence curriculum?

In a word, money.  The government will spend $170 million on abstinence programs in 2005.  Mr. Waxman doesn't like that.  He would rather see that money go to his "comprehensive" sex education programs.  And so, he's trying to get the public to associate "abstinence education" with "medically inaccurate," so that he can create a public outcry, and try to limit or remove that funding.

Don't let it work.  Abstinence education protects our teenagers.    It keeps them pure.  It can save their lives.

"Protects teenagers."  "Saves lives."  Those are the terms we need to
associate with "abstinence education."

For more information, to go The Heritage Foundation, or The Medical Institute
.

(This article was originally published as "Waxman Mangles the Facts" in December 2004.)


Ignatius Press books by Mary Beth Bonacci:


Mary Beth Bonacci is internationally known for her talks and writings about love, chastity, and sexuality. Since 1986 she has spoken to tens of thousands of young people, including 75,000 people in 1993 at World Youth Day in Denver, Colorado. She appears frequently on radio and television programs, including several appearances on MTV.

Mary Beth has written two books, We're on a Mission from God and Real Love, and also writes a regular, syndicated column for various publications. She has developed numerous videos, including her brand-newest video series, also entitled Real Love. Her video Sex and Love: What's a Teenager to Do? was awarded the 1996 Crown Award for Best Youth Curriculum.

Mary Beth holds a bachelor's degree in Organizational Communication from the University of San Francisco, and a master's degree in Theology of Marriage and Family from the John Paul II Institute at Lateran University. She was also awarded an honorary doctorate in Communications from the Franciscan University of Steubenville, and is listed in Outstanding Young Women of America for 1997.

Visit Mary Beth and Real Love Incorporated online here.







   




www.ignatiusinsight.com
World Wide Web






















 
IgnatiusInsight.com

Place your order toll-free at 1-800-651-1531

Ignatius Press | P.O. Box 1339 | Ft. Collins, CO 80522
Web design under direction of Ignatius Press.
Send your comments or web problems to:

Copyright 2014 by Ignatius Press

IgnatiusInsight.com catholic blog books insight scoop weblog ignatius