| |
 |
| |
|
|
SEARCH |
| |
About
Ignatius Insight |
| |
Who We Are |
 |
Article Archives |
| |
Most Recent |
| |
July-Dec 2005 |
| |
Apr-Jun 2005 |
| |
Jan-Mar 2005 |
| |
Nov-Dec 2004 |
| |
June-Oct 2004 |
 |
Interviews |
| |
Insight Scoop Weblog |
| |
Author Pages |
| |
Pope John Paul II/ Karol Wojtyla |
| |
Pope Benedict XVI/Cardinal Ratzinger |
| |
Rev. Louis Bouyer |
| |
G.K. Chesterton |
| |
Fr. Thomas Dubay |
| |
Mother Mary Francis |
| |
Fr. Benedict Groeschel |
| |
Thomas Howard |
| |
Karl Keating |
| |
Msgr Ronald Knox |
| |
Peter Kreeft |
| |
Fr. Henri de Lubac, SJ |
| |
Michael O'Brien |
| |
Joseph Pearce |
| |
Josef Pieper |
| |
Richard Purtill |
| |
Steve Ray |
| |
Christoph Cardinal Schönborn, OP |
| |
Fr. James V. Schall, SJ |
| |
Frank Sheed |
| |
Fr. Hans Urs von Balthasar |
| |
Adrienne von Speyr |
| |
Books |
| |
Press Info |
| |
Music |
| |
Videos |
| |
CD-ROMs |
| |
Sacred
Art |
| |
Catechetical
Resources |
| |
Loome/Ignatius
Project |
| |
Magazines |
| |
Catholic
World Report |
| |
H&P
Review |
| |
Request
Catalog |
| |
Web Specials |
| |
|
| |
Ignatius
Press |
| |
History |
| |
Staff |
| |
Specials |
| |
Contact |
| |
|
| |
Noteworthy News |
| |
Catholic World News |
| |
EWTN News |
| |
Vatican News |
| |
Catholic News Agency |
| |
ZENIT |
| |
Catholic News |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Pied Piper of Atheism: Philip Pullman and Children's Fantasy
| Pete Vere and Sandra Miesel
God Is No Delusion: A Refutation of Richard Dawkins
| Thomas Crean, O.P.
Socrates Meets Descartes
| Peter Kreeft
Sermon in a Sentence: Saint Thomas Aquinas
| John McClernon
New Outpourings of the Spirit
| Joseph Ratzinger
Meet Henri De Lubac
| Rudolf Voderholzer
Marian Devotion in the Domestic Church
| Catherine & Peter Fournier
Joseph Ratzinger: Life in the Church and Living Theology
| Maximilian Heinrich Heim
The Greek Fathers: Their Lives and Adventures
| Adrian Fortescue
Ignatius Catholic Study Bible: The Letter to the Hebrews
| Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch
Chastity, Poverty and Obedience
| Mother Mary Francis, P.C.C.
The Blessing of Christmas
| Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
Chance or Purpose?: Creation, Evolution, and a Rational Faith
| Chrisoph Cardinal Schšnborn
Island of the World: A Novel
| Michael O'Brien
The Order of Things
| James V. Schall, S.J.
The Judge: William P. Clark, Ronald Reagan's Top Hand
| Paul Kengor & Patricia Clark Doerner
Seek that Which is Above
| Pope Benedict XVI
Jesus, the Apostles and the Early Church
| Pope Benedict XVI
God and His Image: An Outline of Biblical Theology
| Dominique Barthelemey
An Invitation to Faith: An A to Z Primer on the Thought of Pope Benedict XVI
| Pope Benedict XVI
Mother Benedict: Foundress of the Abbey of Regina Laudis
| Antoinette Bosco
Pope Benedict XVI: The Conscience of Our Age
| Vincent Twomey
Ronald Knox as Apologist: Wit, Laughter and the Popish Creed
| Fr. Milton Walsh
Christians in China: A.D. 600-2000
| Jean Charbonnier
|
| |

Jesus was touring towns and villages of Galilee, teaching in synagogues,
proclaiming the good news of Gods reign, curing every sickness and
disease, when the crowds swelled to great numbers. He "had compassion
on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd"
(Matt. 9:36). It was at this time that he made a significant request to
the disciples:
The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; pray therefore the Lord
of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest (Matt. 9:36-37; the
RSV version is used throughout this article).
In this writing my observations are directed to those called to priestly
celibacy. But in a broader sense they are addressed to each and every vocation
to which Christ calls his people. "For we are his workmanship, created
in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should
walk in them" (Eph. 2:10).
Peter may have initially prayed for vocations with no small struggle: "Shall
I pray that others abandon wife and home as I am doing? Is that the right
thing to do?" James and John may have reminisced similarly: "We
left our father in the boat alone. Was it right? Shall we pray that others
abandon their father as we did? "Matthew may have reflected: "Just
when I had job security I tossed it to the winds. Shall I ask the Lord to
induce others to do a thing like that?" Christ was asking them implicitly
to re-affirm their own vocation while they prayed for more laborers in the
harvest field.
Peter once articulated what all of them may have been thinking: "Whats
in this for us?"
And Peter said: "Lo, we have left our homes and followed you."
And he said to them, "Truly I say to you, there is no man who has left
house or wife or brothers or parents or children for the sake of the kingdom
of God, who will not receive manifold more in this time, and in the age
to come eternal life" (Luke 18:28-30).
All of us have left our homes, said Peter. Jesus knew that. He had met Peters
wife, had called James and John away from their father, and knew the circumstances
of each. His response reassured them. He invited them to pray that others
would do the same. Matthews version has additional specifics:
Truly I say to you in the new world, when the
Son of man shall sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me
will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
And every one who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or
mother or children or lands, for my names sake, will receive a
hundredfold, and inherit eternal life (Matt. 19:28-29).
The response included tantalizing words about twelve
thrones. Christ did not explain. They had much to learn. The mother of James
and John heard this promise about thrones and put in a good word for her
boys: their thrones should be latched to that of Jesus, one to the right,
one to the left. The Messianic kingdom danced before her eyes and the eyes
of the apostles. Even when Christ was about to ascend into heaven they still
had an earthly kingdom in mind: "Lord, are you going to restore the
rule to Israel now?" (Acts 1:7).
Peter had once advised Jesus to stop this talk about suffering many things
in Jerusalem and being killed there. Jesus cut him short: "Get behind
me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me; for you are not on the side of God,
but of men" (Matt. 16:23). He went on to teach them that "if any
man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and
follow me" (Matt. 16:24). Only after the Holy Spirit descended on them
with power did they finally understand and accept their true vocation. They
are to be a continuation in the world of the Christ who "loved the
church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed
her by the washing of water and the word, that he might present the church
to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that
she might be holy and without blemish" (Eph. 5:25-26). Christ had asked
them to pray for vocations even when their understanding of the concept
was still imperfect. He would inspire the new recruits patiently, as he
was presently building up priestly qualities in the small band of apostles.
Jesus also promised that they would receive even in this life "many
times" more than what they had left behind: "a hundredfold now
in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and
lands, with persecution, and in the age to come eternal life" (Mark
10:29-30). Between the lines we may read that when Mark wrote his Gospel
the early Christians were already accustomed to think of the celibate clergy
as part of their family.
Today we hear a different message from the world and the media, clashing
with Christs type of clerical formation: "Drop obligatory celibacy;
ordain women; we are church!" Words of the Old Testament preacher come
to mind:
The wind blows to the south,
And goes round to the north;
Round and round goes the wind,
And on its circuits the wind returns (Eccl. 1:6).
Truly, unless the Lord build the house, they labor
in vain who build it. And unless we pray for vocations by making our own
the mind of Christ, we pray like puffs of wind. "Round and round
goes the wind" of such prayer. Christ sleeps and does not listen.
The vertical dimensions of the priestly vocation
Christ coached the disciples through exercises of working miracles. He
channeled through them extraordinary powers of his own, which were out
of range of their native talents. He sent them on missions during which
"they cast out many demons and anointed with oil many that were sick
and healed them" (Mark 6:13). Not with medical skills, not with magic
words, but with exciting powers of Christ in them they worked these wonders.
They were being exposed to the rarefied atmosphere of the "other
world."
Their lifestyle should bespeak their disconnect from secular pursuits.
Money should not turn their heads: "The gift you have received, give
as a gift," (Matt. 10:8). Henceforth "The Lord is my portion
and my inheritance" is their mandated lifestyle (Dominus pars
mea et hereditas mea).
This having been said, nevertheless the three-year apostolic course was
not all work and no play. The promised "hundred fold reward in this
life" sometimes showed through. At Cana the wine was excellent, and
there was plenty of it. The occasional stop at Martha and Marys
house had its gastronomical rewards. They had money to shop for the noon
meal when stopping off at Jacobs well in the town of Sheckem. The
women who followed Jesus to serve him (cf. Mark 15:41) may have helped
to provide for the apostles as well. When on mission journeys, Jesus instructed
them to seek hospitality with someone who was worthy. There is no record
of instructions that they should seek out the poorest house in the neighborhood.
Prayers for vocations heal secular thoughts
Prayers for true vocations according to the intentions of Christ will
transform the thoughts of those who pray. Bishops, priests, and seminarians
will grow into the mind of Christ, who loves the Church, who has compassion
because the flock is "harassed and helpless, like sheep without a
shepherd" (Matt. 9:36). Pope John Paul II pointed out that priests
are Christs extended presence in a very special manner:
Through the ministerial priesthood Christ continues his saving
mission down to our time. For this reason, he appointed Bishops and priests,
who "in the Church and on behalf of the Church . . . are a sacramental
representation of Jesus Christ, Head and Shepherd, authoritatively
proclaiming his Word, repeating his acts of forgiveness and his offer
of salvation" (Apostolic Exhortation Pastores dabo vobis,
n. 15). They are sent to preach the good news to the poor, to proclaim
release to the captives and sight to the blind; to set at liberty those
who are oppressed (cf. Luke 4:18). Therefore, ministry in the Church
is not a human achievement, but a divine institution.
With all respect and esteem for the valuable services of the laity in
parish communities, it should never be forgotten: in the sacramental realm
a lay person cannot replace what is distinctive of the priest. Only a
priest can replace another priest (Address at Sankt Polten, Austria on
June 20, 1998).
The Pope also pointed out to members of Serra International that prayer
for vocations is a school of life:
But at the same time prayer for vocations is also a school of life as
I had occasion recently to point out: "By praying for vocations we
learn to look with Gospel wisdom at the world and at each persons
need for life and salvation; it is a way of sharing in Christs love
and compassion for all mankind" (7 December 2000).
The early Church prayed for laborers
It is not likely that the Gospels would have recorded Christs request
for vocational prayers if the early Christians had not already been doing
exactly that. When the hundred and twenty disciples were assembled in
the Upper Room after Christs Ascension, they "devoted themselves
to constant prayer" (Acts 1:14). The first order of business at the
Assembly was to select a worthy apostle to fill the vacancy left by Judas.
Then on Pentecost Peter preached a powerful first message, and Baptisms
began, some three thousand on that very day. They needed help to manage
the logistics. Next we hear about the ordination of deacons. Soon we read
that Paul and Barnabas installed presbyters in each church with prayer
and fasting (Acts 14:23). They would not have done so, we assume, if the
Church in Jerusalem had not authorized such procedure. We also assume
that the early Church adopted guidelines concerning the laying on of hands
for ordination of bishops and presbyters, which Paul then passed on to
Timothy (1 Tim. 3).
One of the challenging qualifications for ordination was giving up family
life. Pope John Paul II read in the Gospel an implication that the apostles
were celibate: "According to the Gospel, it appears that the Twelve,
destined to be the first to share in his priesthood, renounced family
life in order to follow him" (General Audience of 17th July 1993).
We may infer from this that when the early Church prayed for vocations,
this included prayers for a celibate clergy.
Furthermore, their prayers likely asked for a clergy with courage. Bishops
and presbyters were high profile targets for persecution. When Herod killed
James with the sword and saw that it pleased the Jews, he next laid hands
on Peter (Acts 12). Eventually, Peter and perhaps all the apostles became
martyrs.
The models for the clergy which Jesus had shown to the Church had been
selected with care. One rich young man was rejected because attachment
to wealth was a problem (Matt. 19). Another loved too much the comforts
of home life: "The foxes have lairs, the birds of the air have nests,
but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head," (Luke 9:57). Still
another failed the test of unconditioned obedience: "Let me bury
my father first" he said (Luke 9:60).

   
Shoring up chastity among the clergy
Why is it that the number of seminarians in theologates in the USA declined
dramatically from 8000 students in 1967-68, to 4000 in the year 2000?
Note the year 1968. It is the year in which Father Charles Curran led
a massive dissent against Humanae Vitae. "Readers with long
memories will hearken hack to July 30, 1968, when 87 Catholic theologians
from 24 different Catholic higher-education institutions issued their
ringing dissent the shot heard round the world!
against Pope Paul VIs encyclical Humanae Vitae (a dissent
later to be subscribed to by more than 600 theological dissenters). .
." (Kenneth D. Whitehead, Crisis, January 2001). Part of that
manifesto of dissent reads: "It is common teaching in the Church
that Catholics may dissent from authoritative non-infallible teachings
of the Magisterium when sufficient reasons for doing so exist." That
is an egregious and manifest error. From it sprang a "culture of
death" in its manifestations of rampant contraception, sterilization,
divorce, live-in before marriage, sodomy and others. Dissent in Catholic
seminaries is the genie now out of the bottle. Until our seminaries recover
obedience to the Magisterium and cultivate a love for the Vicar of Christ,
look for further closing of seminaries.
Dissent is now institutionalized and fermenting in the Catholic Theological
Society of America. Some years ago, before I cut my membership, I attended
the unfortunate meeting during which the Society elected Father Charles
Curran as vice president. Thunderous applause broke loose in the hall
when his name was announced as the winner. I simply sat in my chair without
clapping hands. Next to me sat a member applauding wildly with the rest.
He looked at me askance. Applause continued, I sat unmoving. He looked
at me again, and then again, and finally in disgust, got up and moved
away from me to another row of chairs. It was the last year in which I
paid membership dues to the Society.
The dissent of CTSA is currently directed against the document Ex Corde
Ecclesiae. "The marked anti-Roman attitude of the CTSA a decade
ago seems to be little changed today," observes Whitehead in the
article cited above.
Cardinal Bernard Law voiced his disappointment with the continued dissent
of CTSA, and asked for a change:
What a pity that those who have a strangle hold
on the CTSA are so turned in on themselves. The academic theological community
has become victim to the various politically correct currents of academe.
. . . It becomes difficult if not impossible for them to evangelize the
culture which has formed and which sustains them. . . .
It is no secret that some theologians beat the drums for a minimalist
view of papal teaching authority. It is no secret that some administrators
and academics view with alarm that truth illumined by faith should have
a privileged place in a Catholic university. . . .
How many missed opportunities have passed the CTSA by in this and other
issues. How pitiable it is to see the rich Catholic theological tradition
put under the bushel basket of politically correct bromides. What a wasteland
is the professional Catholic theological community as represented by the
CTSA. . . (Pilot, June 18, 1997).
Where will reform begin? Seminaries, I believe, will
be the leaders of the return to obedience to the teaching of the Church
against contraception. The seminaries whose staffs stand firmly with the
Pope will be the band of apostles which will continue what the first seminary
started with Christ as its Teacher.
More things are wrought by prayer than we dream of. Dissenters today may
be our leaders in obedience to the Magisterium tomorrow.
Some of the chief priests and elders who had convinced the crowd to ask
for Barabbas and have Jesus put to death (Matt. 27:20) likely converted
later on: "There were many priests among those who embraced the faith"
(Acts 6:7).
Saul concurred in the act of killing Stephen, who died praying for his murderers.
Sauls fame and power grew overnight in Jerusalem, riding on the wave
of a burning rage against Christ. But Christ made an apostle Paul out of
Saul some weeks later. And more than one dissenter of 1968 is today a staunch
defender of Humanae Vitae. We pray that more Sauls of 1968 will become
Pauls with the grace of Christ.
David had a shameful affair with Bathsheba, then had her husband murdered
to hide the fact. Nathan confronted him bluntly: "Thou art the man."
David confessed, and accepted his penance. He became an ancestor of Christ
through Solomon, son of his union with Bathsheba.
Long enough has the number of seminarians in the USA been in a tail spin,
and long enough have dissenters barked against Peter at seminary conferences.
We pray that dissenters will convert and become distinguished theologians.
While praying, we should also take such action as is indicated. The advice
which Fr. Paul Shaughnessy gives to counter aggressive sodomites can be
addressed also, mutatis mutandis, to counter dissent in seminaries:
What Rome can do: Require heads on platters. No man should be
made a bishop, and no bishop should be promoted, unless he embraces authentic
Catholic doctrine about sexual morality and leads a morally upright life.
But the first condition is too easy to fake; anyone can give lip service
to the teaching. Therefore no man should be elevated unless he has a track
record as a head-cracker and has cleaned up problems of sexual wrongdoing,
by dismissing gay seminarians or seminary faculty, for example, or by getting
rid of miscreants at a university chaplaincy. The reason is that gays are
perfectly prepared to let one of their own number mouth Church teaching
if by so doing he earns a promotion; but if a man exposes their iniquity
and acts against it, they will retaliate fiercely if there is any ammunition
to be had, any wrongdoing, that is, in their adversarys past. They
will do the necessary vetting out of vindictiveness. Keep in mind that this
goes for heterosexual mischief as well. Rome should make it clear that,
before a man can be considered episcopal material, he needs scalps hanging
from his belt. God knows there is no shortage of opportunities (The Catholic
World Report, November 2000).
If bishops uproot dissension from seminaries, the reform will be on its
way. May I add a piece of advice: watch what you read. I remember some years
ago getting a telephone call from my classmate priest, a beloved pastor
in Nagasaki.
"After years of reading the National Catholic Reporter, Im
giving it up. I dont think it is good for me," he said. It was
good news for me. He had discerned that the NCR was impoverishing his priestly
life and belittling the majestic picture of the Church that he was supposed
to uphold for his people. In the meantime he has gone to his eternal reward.
I say to seminarians and priests, read the weekly edition in English of
the Osservatore Romano. It helps you to be proud of your Mother.
Russell Shaw speaks out against a progressive desacralization of the priesthood
in the USA during the past three decades, namely "the progressive theologians
and popularizers who, taking their lead from authors like Hans Küng
and Edward Schillebeeckx, O.P. have been promoting a desacralized version
of priestly ministry for three decades" (Crisis, December 2000).
Against this, he continues, Pope John Paul II has spoken many times that
a priests commitment to serve his people should be modeled on Christ,
whose service to humanity reached fullest expression in "his death
on the Cross . . . his total gift of self in humility and love."
Dissent, desacralization, sodomy, has no legitimacy in seminaries. Formation
must be modeled on that which Christ gave to his apostles. The clergy must
carry on the Tradition which he initiated.
In the year 390 a group of Bishops gathered at Carthage to review the issue
of celibacy. The record implies that most of them were married, but they
were abstaining from intercourse with their wives after Ordination in accordance
with the ancient Tradition. The record also highlights one reason for abstinence:
"So that they may obtain in all simplicity what they are asking for
from God." The public expected that the prayers of chaste priests had
a built-in priority with the Lord. Having ascertained once more the Tradition,
the Bishops then unanimously renewed their vows: "What the apostles
have taught and what antiquity itself observed, we also shall keep"
(Ut quod apostoli docuerunt et ipsa servavit antiquitas, nos quoque custodiamus;
see The
Apostolic Origins of Priestly Celibacy, Christian Cochini, SJ, p.
5; Ignatius Press, 1990).
Today, 400,000 priests around the globe struggle to be chaste. They sense
that their chastity helps to build up the Church. The Byzantine canonist
Zonaras articulated what they experience in their lives from day to day:
"If priests practice all the virtues and converse in full trust with
God, they will obtain right away all that they are asking for" (see
Cochini, p. 7).
Blessed Pope John XXIII asked that priests continue to struggle to keep
the obligations of celibacy, especially when the Church needs heroic people
to be the salt of the earth:
It deeply hurts us that . . . anyone can dream that the Church will deliberately
or even suitably renounce what from time immemorial has been, and still
remains, one of the purest and noblest glories of her priesthood. The law
of ecclesiastical celibacy and the efforts necessary to preserve it always
recall to mind the struggles of heroic times when the Church of Christ had
to fight for and succeeded in obtaining her threefold glory, always an emblem
of victory, that is, the Church of Christ, free, chaste, and catholic (John
XXIII, to Roman Synod, January 26, 1960).
We pray: "Lord Jesus, send chaste laborers into your harvest field.
We pray to the Lord. Amen."
This article originally appeared in Homiletic
& Pastoral Review, July 2001.
Reverend Anthony Zimmerman is Professor Emeritus
of moral theology, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan. He promotes Natural
Family Planning and publishes books and articles. His latest two books published
by University Press of America are: Evolution
and the Sin of Eden, and The
Primeval Revelation in Myths and in Genesis. More of Father Zimmerman's
writings can be found at CatholicMind.com.
| | |
|
|
|
G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936) was one of the finest Christian authors and apologists
of the past two hundred years. Raised as an agnostic, he embraced Christianity as a young man, ultimately entering the Catholic Church
in 1922. He wrote hundreds of essays, as well as novels, short stories, poetry, apologetics, literary
criticism, and nearly everything else imaginable. Dale Ahlquist, president and co-founder of the American
Chesterton Society and author of
G.K Chesterton: Apostle of Common Sense, writes, "Chesterton was equally at ease with literary and social criticism,
history, politics, economics, philosophy, and theology. His style is unmistakable, always marked
by humility, consistency, paradox, wit, and wonder. His writing remains as timely and as timeless
today as when it first appeared, even though much of it was published in throw away paper." Read more
about the life and work of this remarkable thinker, author, and apologist.
|
Confessions of an Ex-Feminist
by Lorraine V. Murray
Confessions is the honest and heart-rending account of a woman who was born into a Catholic family, attended parochial schools and
fully embraced the beliefs of her faith, but ran into major roadblocks in college. Amidst the radical feminist college environment of
the 1960's, she lost her faith, and her morality, jumping aboard the bandwagon of "free love." She indulged in a series of love relationships
in college, all of which crashed and burned. Despite the obvious contradiction between feminist teachings and her own experience,
Murray still believed she had to free herself from the yoke of tradition. Attaining a doctorate in philosophy, with an emphasis on the
feminist writings of Simone de Beauvoir, Murray taught philosophy in college. For many years, she launched a personal vendetta against
God and the Catholic Church in the classroom, trying to persuade students that God did not exist, mocking values Catholics hold dear,
and touted feminism as the cure for many social ills. When she discovered she was pregnant, Murray followed the route that feminists
offer as a solution for unmarried women. Much to her surprise, her abortion was a shattering emotional experience, which she grieved
over for years. It was the first tragic chink in her feminist armor.
Read more about Confessions of an Ex-Feminist, or
read an excerpt from the book.
|
|
| |