| || ||
Eschatological Fact and Fiction: Catholicism and
Dispensationalism Compared | Carl E. Olson | June 10, 2006
Have you ever had non-Catholic friends ask questions such as, "Do Catholics
believe in the Rapture?" and "Why doesn't the Catholic Church
interpret the book of Revelation literally?"? Perhaps you or someone you
know has read the best-selling Left Behind books and wants to know if they are "biblically sound."
Maybe you saw a televangelist explaining that Christ will come soon to
"rapture" Christians from earth, but you've never heard your priest talk about it.
On June 6, 2006, the fifteenth and final Left Behind novel, titled
The Rapture: In The Twinkling of an Eye, was published (it is the third
"prequel" of the series). The series of "end times" novels, which
debuted in 1995, was co-authored by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, two
Fundamentalist Protestant authors, and has sold over 60 million copies. 
Many Catholics have read the books, and while some recognize that the books do
not completely agree with Catholic doctrine, others assume they are compatible.
Aren't the authors devout Christians trying to spread the Gospel?  And, of
course, even Catholics who have not read any of the Left Behind books have often encountered questions about the
Rapture, the Antichrist, the Tribulation, and the end of the world.
Given this situation, this article seeks to do two things. First, outline Catholic
beliefs about the "last days," relying on Scripture and the Catechism
of the Catholic Church (CCC). Second,
compare those teachings with the belief in the Rapture as it is found in the Left
Behind novels and related works.
Are We Living In the "Last Days"?
Are we, as many Christians believe, living in the last
days? In fact, the "last days" refers not only to the "end of
time," but to the last two thousand years. Scripture teaches that the
Incarnation ushered in "the last days." According to Hebrews 1:1-2,
"God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many
portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom
He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world."
At Pentecost, Peter preached that "the last
days" had arrived, in fulfillment of the words of the prophet Joel:
"For these men are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is only the third
hour of the day; but this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: 'And
it shall be in the last days,' God says, that I will pour forth my spirit on
all mankind . . ." (Acts 2:15-17; cf. Joel 2:28-32).
"The last days" or "the end times,"
properly understood, refers to the time of the New Covenant, the gathering together
of God's people in the Church, which is "on earth, the seed and the
beginning of the kingdom" (CCC 567, 669; Lumen Gentium 3, 5). The Holy Spirit, the "soul of the
Church," has been -- and is being -- poured out, because of the redemptive
work of Jesus Christ:
The Holy Spirit is at work with the Father and the Son from the beginning to the
completion of the plan for our salvation. But in these "end times,"
ushered in by the Son's redeeming Incarnation, the Spirit is revealed and
given, recognized and welcomed as a person. Now can this divine plan,
accomplished in Christ, the firstborn and head of the new creation, be embodied
in mankind by the outpouring of the Spirit: as the Church, the communion of
saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life
everlasting (CCC 686).
This understanding of the "last days" differs
from that held by those who believe in the Rapture. Catholics agree that there
will definitely be an "end of time" and that history, as we know it,
will one day be complete. But we also recognize that each of us will face the
end of our time on earth, and that this should, in many ways, concern us more
than the end of the world (see CCC 1007).
Church Authority and Bible Prophecy
The Bible is truly the Word of God, and when the Word of
God says that the Church is the Body of Christ (Eph 1:22-23; 5:22-33) and the
"pillar and support of truth" (1 Tim 3:15), it points to a key
principle: the task of authentically interpreting Scripture belongs to the
Church. And the Church has a certain structure, based on Christ's own choosing
of apostles and granting them authority: "For, of course, all that has
been said about the manner of interpreting Scripture is ultimately subject to
the judgment of the Church which exercises the divinely conferred commission
and ministry of watching over and interpreting the Word of God" (CCC 119).
This does not mean that the Catholic Church has
definitively interpreted every single passage of Scripture or that individual
Catholics cannot study Scripture for themselves. On the contrary, the Church
has definitively interpreted less than a dozen passages, while encouraging
Catholics to read the Bible in light of the "living Tradition of the whole
Church" (CCC 113).
The issue of authority in interpreting Scripture is
important because so much of what passes for "Biblical prophecy"
today is really pseudo-Biblical guesswork, noteworthy for its use of sloppy
methods, hazy conjecture, and overt sensationalism. Many "prophecy
teachers," especially in recent decades, have taken passages of Scripture
and applied them to current events and people with little or no regard for
historical context or original meaning of the texts. This has resulted, for
example, in the Antichrist being identified as the Pope, Hitler, Gorbachev,
Ronald Reagan, Saddam Hussein, and other, lesser-known people.
The puzzling and sometimes shocking images of Revelation
are interpreted in clever, bizarre, and, on occasion, even laughable ways. The
mark of the beast (Rev 13:16-18) is seen in bar codes, credit cards, computer
chips and laser beams. Most Catholics who encounter such misinterpretations
usually scratch their heads and steer clear of the biblical books that deal
with apocalyptic themes, Daniel and Revelation. They are content to let their
non-Catholic friends battle over these confusing matters.
This is unfortunate for a couple of reasons. First,
Catholics should study all of Scripture, including difficult books such as
Daniel and Revelation, because God gave it to the Church for that purpose.
Second, the Catholic Church offers two thousand years of reflection and study
of Scripture, resulting in a rich, balanced, and nuanced understanding of the
whole Bible. If the Catholic Church has the authority that Catholics believe
she possesses, then they need to take seriously her understanding of Scripture.
At the very least, doing so will help them avoid the serious misunderstandings
of some other Christians and will equip Catholics to discuss these
misunderstandings with them.
Defining Essential Terms
The Left Behind books are based on a theological system known as premillennial
dispensationalism, or, more simply, dispensationalism. This term refers to the
belief that God works in history through a series of different epochs, or
dispensations. In each of these periods, God tests man in a certain way. Man
fails the test, and then God judges man. On this view, man now lives during the
"Church Age," which is so full of apostasy and error that only a
remnant of "true believers" remains.
According to dispensationalism, God is pursuing two
purposes in history: one involving an earthly people (Israel) and the other, a
heavenly people (the Church).  Dispensationalists believe that when Jesus
Christ came, He offered the earthly people, Israel, a physical, earthly
kingdom, but that they rejected Him as their Messiah. Consequently, Jesus
formed a heavenly people, the Church, who are not meant to reign here on earth,
but will reign with Him in heaven.
However, God will still fulfill the many Old Testament
promises to Israel, His earthly people, because, dispensationalists insist,
those promises were unconditional. When Christ founded the Church, all of those
promises were "put on hold" until the heavenly people were removed
from the earth in the Rapture. Since Israel has now been re-established as a
nation, most dispensationalists believe that the removal of the Church via the
Rapture can occur at any moment.
The Rapture will be a secret "snatching up" of
all true believers in Christ to heaven; it will be immediately followed --
according to most dispensationalists -- by seven years of Tribulation and the
reign of the Antichrist. At the end of the Tribulation, Christ will come again
to establish an earthly, thousand-year reign, based in Jerusalem, where a new
temple (complete with animal sacrifices) will exist.  Hence the descriptive
"premillennial," because of the belief that Jesus will return prior
to the millennial, earthly kingdom.
The dispensationalist view of the end times -- based on a
radical distinction between two people of God and the notion of a
"pre-tribulation" Rapture event -- was first developed in the
1830s by an ex-Anglican priest named John Nelson Darby, who condemned most of
Christendom as apostate and worldly. Dispensationalism subsequently spread
throughout the U.S., in the early 1900s, as a result of the popular Scofield
Reference Bible, which incorporated
dispensationalist ideas into its footnotes. In the 1970s, the doctrine was
popularized through the best-selling books such as The Late Great Planet
Earth by Hal Lindsey. 
Some Catholics dismiss these unusual beliefs as
unimportant. But that is a mistake for a number of reasons. For one thing,
despite waning popularity in scholarly theological circles, dispensationalism
is still a widespread belief system among Fundamentalists and some
Evangelicals, even many of those who are unfamiliar with the term or with the
full scope of dispensational theology.
Another reason is that the vast majority of
dispensationalists are either actively opposed to, or are very suspicious of,
the Catholic Church. Many of them believe the Catholic Church will play a
central role in a coming one world apostate religion. In a sense, this
shouldn't come as a surprise, since the core of dispensationalism is incompatible
with Catholic doctrine, even though dispensationalism and Catholicism are
compatible on some secondary issues.
Moreover, many Catholics who leave the Church are drawn
towards groups that teach dispensationalism in one form or another. The belief
in the Rapture is often what attracts these straying Catholics.
Finally, through Fundamentalist and conservative Evangelical
political activity, dispensationalist ideas and interests have had a
significant influence on U.S. foreign policy towards Israel and the Middle
East, and on how many of these Christians view world events and political
situations. Many Fundamentalist and Evangelical Christians are staunch allies
of Israel for theological, rather than political reasons.
Two People of God, or Just One?
Eschatology, the study of the last things, flows directly from ecclesiology, the doctrine of the Church. This explains some of the
significant differences between what Catholics and many Fundamentalists believe
about the end of time. While Tim LaHaye, Hal Lindsey, and other popular
dispensationalists teach that God has two people -- the Church and Israel -- the
Catholic Church asserts that God has always had only one people, or family,
throughout history. According to Catechism, "This 'family of God' is gradually formed and takes shape
during the stages of human history, in keeping with the Father's plan. In fact,
'already present in figure at the beginning of the world, this Church was
prepared in marvelous fashion in the history of the people of Israel . . . .
Established in this last age of the world and made manifest in the outpouring
of the Spirit, it will be brought to glorious completion at the end of
time'" (CCC 759).
Therefore, the Catholic Church has always understood
herself to be the New Israel (Gal 6:16; Eph 2:11-12) and the new People of God
(1 Pet 2:9-10) -- the recipients of the New Covenant given through Christ (Heb
8:8-13). The Old Covenant was not rejected by Christ, but fulfilled and taken
up into the New Covenant. This difference between dispensationalism and
Catholic doctrine is the basis for other disagreements, including those
involving the Rapture and the nature of the millennium.
(Interestingly enough, even Martin Luther and John Calvin
understood the Church to be the true heir of Israel. They also would have
rejected dispensationalism, which only emerged as a method of biblical
interpretation in the last two hundred years or so.)
Catholic doctrine also teaches that the Church is
intimately related to the Kingdom of God. The Church is "ultimately one,
holy, catholic, and apostolic in her deepest and ultimate identity, because it
is in her that 'the Kingdom of heaven,' the 'Reign of God,' already exists and
will be fulfilled at the end of time" (CCC 865). The Kingdom is not yet
complete, but began with the Incarnation and will be fully realized at the end
of time: "The kingdom of heaven was inaugurated on earth by Christ. 'This
kingdom shone out before men in the word, in the works and in the presence of
Christ.' The Church is the seed and beginning of this kingdom. Its keys are
entrusted to Peter" (CCC 567). In its fullness, the Kingdom is not an
earthly reign, but the final triumph of Christ over the power of sin and Satan,
culminating in an eternity spent in communion with the Triune God: "The
kingdom has come in the person of Christ and grows mysteriously in the hearts
of those incorporated into him, until its full eschatological
manifestation" (CCC 865).
In contrast, dispensationalists believe that the Kingdom
will be a thousand-year, earthly reign of Christ, known as the millennium (from
the Latin word for "thousand years"). Belief in a literal
thousand-year earthly reign is called millenarianism or millennialism. It has
been explicitly rejected by the Catholic Church. In 1944, the Holy Office
warned against ". . . the system of mitigated Millenarianism, which
teaches . . . that Christ the Lord before the final judgment, whether or not
preceded by the resurrection of the many just, will come visibly to rule over
this world. . . . The system of mitigated Millenarianism cannot be taught
safely" (CCC 676).
It is true that some of the early Church Fathers before the
fourth century believed in an earthly, millennial reign of Christ. This belief
was largely formed in reaction to gnosticism, which taught, in its various
forms, that Christ and His Kingdom had nothing to do with the physical world
since the material realm, the gnostics claimed, is inherently evil. However,
St. Augustine, writing in the late 300s and early 400s, interpreted the
reference to a "thousand years" in Revelation 20 as a metaphor for
the age of the Church. This would become the accepted (if never formally
defined) belief of the Church, going unchallenged for many centuries. Yet the
Catholic Church has never made a formal statement about what the millennium is,
although Augustine's view has usually been accepted by Catholic theologians.
In addition, none of the Church Fathers believed in a
secret removal of true believers prior to the Tribulation. On the contrary,
they taught that the Church would undergo a period of intense tribulation prior
to the Second Coming. The idea of a "secret" Rapture, developed by
John Nelson Darby in the 1830s,  would have been both foreign and repulsive
to the early Christians, as it was bothersome to many of Darby's Protestant
The Rapture and The Second Coming
The Church tacitly rejects the "secret" Rapture
based on her doctrine of the Church. It has always been Catholic teaching, of
course, that Jesus Christ will physically and visibly return to earth. As
Catholics say in the Creed each week at Eucharistic Liturgy, "He will come
again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no
end" (cf. CCC 681-682).
Yet from the Catholic perspective, the term rapture is problematic. On one hand, it can refer to being taken
to be with Christ (1 Thess. 4:17; see CCC 1025). In fact, the word rapture
comes from Jerome's Latin translation of 1 Thessalonians 4:17, meaning "to
be caught up." Catholics believe this will happen at the Parousia, or Second Coming, when our bodies are resurrected (see
On the other hand, the term "Rapture" is, in a
sense, owned and copyrighted by dispensationalists. In popular discourse, it
almost always refers to a secret snatching away of "true believers,"
prior to the Tribulation, and distinct from the Second Coming. Since the term
Rapture is rarely used in Catholic circles, it is easy to see how confusion
among Catholics might arise. But in any case the Rapture, as dispensationalists
use the term, is contrary to Catholic belief.
Israel, Tribulation, and Antichrist
Another issue is the fate of Israel. What will happen to
Israel in the end? According to the Catechism, "The glorious Messiah's coming is suspended at
every moment of history until His recognition by 'all Israel', for 'a hardening
has come upon part of Israel' in their 'unbelief' toward Jesus" (CCC 674).
The Church, reflecting upon Romans 9-11, believes that Israel will somehow come
to recognize Christ for who He is. Precisely how this will occur the Church has
The Church also says relatively little about the time of
trial or tribulation in the final days. The Church will go through the great
trial, but we do not know how long it will last. The Catechism declares, "Before Christ's Second Coming the Church
must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers.
The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the
'mystery of iniquity' in the form of a religious deception offering men an
apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the
truth" (CCC 675; also see CCC 2642).
This time of trial will be at the start of the "last
days" in the sense of the end of history: "According to the Lord, the
present time is the time of the Spirit and of witness, but also a time still
marked by 'distress' and the time of evil which does not spare the Church and
ushers in the struggles of the last days. It is a time of waiting and
watching" (CCC 672).
Along with this belief in a time of future testing and
trial, the Church teaches that there have been many Antichrists, but there will
also be the Antichrist who leads a worldwide system of anti-Christian belief:
. . . The supreme religious deception is that of the
Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God
and of his Messiah come in the flesh. . . . The Antichrist's deception already
begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize
within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history
through the [end times] judgment. . . . (CCC 675, 676)
This last sentence applies to any sort of utopian scheme
that ignores man's fallen nature, the reality of sin, and man's need for
salvation through Christ.
Interpreting the Book of Revelation
Interpretations of the book of Revelation are,
undoubtedly, among the most hotly debated aspects of the Bible. The Catholic
Church has not officially interpreted the difficult passages in Revelation. But
various Catholic scholars have commented on them, and have debated the various
There are four main approaches to the book of Revelation:
futurist, preterist, historicist and idealist. Futurists believe that most or
all of the book of Revelation has yet to be fulfilled; preterists say that most
or all of it was fulfilled in the first century; historicists claim that events
described in Revelation have been transpiring for the last two thousand years;
and idealists believe that the book of Revelation is allegorical and has little
or nothing to do with historical events. 
The Catholic Church allows a wide range of interpretive
possibilities, including forms of futurism, preterism, historicism and
idealism. For example, a Catholic may believe the book of Revelation describes
the conflict of good and evil as experienced by individual Christians or the
Church (idealism), and makes prophetic utterances about events still to occur
(futurism), and also refers to events that have already occurred, either in the
early Church or later Church history (preterism and historicism).  Catholic
flexibility here is based on the fact that Scripture, inspired by God, often
has different, yet complementary, meanings.
From early times, the Church, following the examples of
Christ and the Apostles (i.e., Lk 24:25-27; 1 Cor 10:1-4), understood Scripture
to have different senses, a literal and a spiritual sense (CCC 115). As the
Catechism explains, the spiritual sense is always rooted in the literal sense:
"The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and
discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation: 'All other
senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal'" (CCC 116).
A common misconception is that Catholics interpret
Scripture -- especially the book of Revelation -- "symbolically," while
Evangelicals interpret it "literally." This has often been used to
explain why the Catholic Church rejects an earthly, thousand-year reign of
Christ. Yet few "literalists" bother to interpret literally other
images in Revelation, such as the Beast, the dragon, the locusts, and the four
horsemen. And many Catholics, following the lead of St. Augustine, believe the
millennium is a literal era of history -- the Church age -- described in a
A Final Word on the Last Days
In conclusion, it can be seen that the Catholic Church
says relatively little about future events leading up to Christ's Second
Coming. Many of the Church's teachings are rejections (either implicit or
explicit), not affirmations, of particular beliefs such as the dispensational
dichotomy between the Church and Israel, the "secret" Rapture, and
the earthly millennial kingdom. What she does teach is quite clear, as well as
succinct: there will be a Second Coming, a time of trial which the Church must
endure, an Antichrist, a conversion of Israel to Christ, a definitive judgment
of all people, and the fulfillment of the Kingdom that has already begun in the
Church. Within those parameters, Catholics may freely roam, search the
Scriptures, and seek to better understand the Word of God.
 The first book of the series, Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth's Last Days, was published in 1995. Of
the fourteen books that followed, at least two, The Indwelling (book #7) and The Mark (book #8),
reached the top of numerous best-sellers lists, including the New York Times, Publishers Weekly, USA Today, and Wall
 Some Catholics with whom I have corresponded have taken this attitude. One
Catholic suggested that we focus on the positive things in the Left Behind series and how to use them to evangelize. This
correspondent described it as "paranoid" to try to find
anti-Catholicism in the books.
Charles C. Ryrie, a leading dispensationalist since the early 1960s, writes,
"A dispensationalist keeps Israel and the Church distinct" (Dispensationalism
Today [Chicago: Moody Press, 1965], 44). He quotes Lewis S. Chafer, another leading dispensational theologian: "The
dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two
distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly
objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with
heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity" (Dispensationalism
 This belief is held by almost all dispensationalists and is based on their
interpretations of Old Testament prophecies. In his commentary Revelation
Unveiled (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan,
1999), LaHaye explains that the prophet Ezekiel "goes into great detail
regarding the matter of worshipping in the Temple, even pointing out that the
sacrificial systems will be reestablished. These sacrifices during the
millennial Kingdom will be to the nation of Israel what the Lord's Supper is to
the Church today: a reminder of what they have been saved from. No meritorious
or efficacious work will be accomplished through these sacrifices. Instead,
they will remind Israel repeatedly of their crucified Messiah . . ." (Revelation
Unveiled, 341). What LaHaye fails to
mention is that Ezekiel never states that the sacrifices will merely be
reminders -- this is a completely unwarranted conclusion and is inconsistent
with LaHaye's supposed "literal" interpretation of Scripture.
 Lindsey's Late Great Planet Earth was
the best-selling book of the 1970s, according to the New York Times. Translated into over fifty languages, it has sales of
thirty-five million copies. Lindsey has authored close to twenty books and
still maintains a high profile in the world of "Bible prophecy."
 In writing about St. Augustine's view of the millennium, Fr. Vincent P. Miceli,
S.J. states: "The real meaning of the thousand years is that the saints
are reigning at the present time with Christ in His kingdom the Church. For the
Church is now, today, His kingdom" (
The Antichrist [Harrison, NY: Roman Catholic Books, 1981], 74).
key role is discussed in my book, Will Catholics Be "Left
Behind"?, especially in chapter 5,
"Millenarianism: Early Church to John Nelson Darby". An excellent examination
of the radical and unorthodox nature of some of Darby's guiding principles is
Ronald M. Henzel's book, Darby, Dualism, and the Decline of
Dispensationalism (Tucson: Fenestra, 2003).
Henzel is an Evangelical and a graduate of Wheaton College.
 Historical premillennialists, who are a minority today among
Fundamentalists and Evangelicals, do not agree with the dispensational
distinction between Israel and the Church, but do believe there will be a
literal, one thousand-year reign of Christ on earth.
Recommended is the Navarre commentary, Revelation: Texts and Commentaries (Four Courts Press, 1992). Another solid Catholic
commentary still in print is Dominican H. M. Feret's The Apocalypse
Explained (Fort Collins, CO: Roman Catholic Books, 1958). An excellent, detailed, and scholarly commentary,
written by Presbyterian theologian David Chilton, is The Days of Vengeance:
An Exposition of the Book of Revelation (Fort Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987). Chilton also wrote a shorter, more
popular commentary, The Great Tribulation (Fort Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987). More recently, Michael Barber has
written an excellent popular-level commentary for Catholics,
Coming Soon: Unlocking the Book of Revelation and Applying Its Lessons Today (Emmaus Road, 2005).
A recent and impressive scholarly commentary is The Revelation to John: A
Commentary on the Greek Text of the Apocalypse (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2005) by Stephen
 These different approaches
to interpreting The Book of Revelation are discussed in detail in "Book of
Confusion or Revelation?", the third chapter of Will Catholics Be "Left
Behind"? Another helpful work is Revelation: Four Views (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1997), a parallel commentary
edited by Steve Gregg, an Evangelical teacher. A related book is The Meaning
of the Millennium: Four Views (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977), edited by Robert G. Clouse.
This article is a revised and updated version of
"Are We Living in the Last Days?" (The Catholic Faith; November/December 2001).
Related Ignatius Insight Articles:
The End Times: The Secret Hidden From the Universe |
Fr. James V. Schall, S.J.
06.06.06 | Is the End At Hand? | An
Interview with Michael O'Brien | Valerie Schmalz
Carl E. Olson is the editor of IgnatiusInsight.com.
He is the co-author of The
Da Vinci Hoax: Exposing the Errors in The Da Vinci Code and author
Catholics Be "Left Behind"? He has written for numerous
Cathlic periodicals and is a regular contributor to National Catholic
Register and Our Sunday Visitor newspapers.
He resides in a top secret location in the Northwest somewhere between Portland,
Oregon and Sacramento, California with his wife, Heather, and two children.
Visit his personal web site at www.carl-olson.com.
the Insight Scoop Blog and read the latest posts and comments by
IgnatiusInsight.com staff and readers about current events, controversies,
and news in the Church!
| || || |