About Ignatius Insight
  Who We Are
  Author Pages
  Pope Benedict XVI/Cardinal Ratzinger
  Pope John Paul II/ Karol Wojtyla
  Rev. Louis Bouyer
  G.K. Chesterton
  Fr. Thomas Dubay
  Mother Mary Francis
  Fr. Benedict Groeschel
  Thomas Howard
  Karl Keating
  Msgr Ronald Knox
  Peter Kreeft
  Fr. Henri de Lubac, SJ
  Michael O'Brien
  Joseph Pearce
  Josef Pieper
  Richard Purtill
  Steve Ray
  Christoph Cardinal Schönborn, OP
  Fr. James V. Schall, SJ
  Frank Sheed
  Fr. Hans Urs von Balthasar
  Adrienne von Speyr
  Louis de Wohl
  Catholic World Report
  H&P Review
Article Archives
  Jan 2006-Present
  July-Dec 2005
  Apr-Jun 2005
  Jan-Mar 2005
  Nov-Dec 2004
  June-Oct 2004
  Press Room
  Sacred Art
  Religious Ed
  Request Catalog
  Web Specials
  Ignatius Press
  Noteworthy News
  Catholic World News
  EWTN News
  Vatican News
  Catholic News Agency
  Catholic News

"Liberation"--And Oppression | Dr. James Hitchcock |

Print-friendly version

A semi-serious objection to the Vatican's recent warning about the work of the Jesuit theologian Jon Sobrino is that the warning temporarily resuscitated something that had been quietly dying--Liberation Theology. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has identified various errors in Father Sobrino's work, and his bishop has said that he cannot teach until he corrects them.

The episode predictably brings into play certain perennial moves, beginning with the charge that the Church is hostile to freedom. Father Sobrino, however, retains whatever rights a resident of El Salvador possesses--the Vatican is not about to throw him in jail. But the Church also has rights, one of which is to safeguard the authenticity of its own teachings. Even the most fervent advocates of freedom--the American Civil Liberties Union, for example--would not tolerate a staff member who expressed disagreement with the group's own purposes.

Those see the Sobrino case primarily through the lens of "freedom" are making a claim that they seldom admit openly--there is no such thing as theological truth, thus it is impossible ever to say that any theologian is in error. But if there is such a thing as truth, the Church has not only a right but an obligation to insure that people know what that truth is.

Father Sobrino and his supporters also charge that his views have been misunderstood or misrepresented. For years heterodox theologians have clamed in effect that Church officials (John Paul II, notably) are too stupid or careless to understand what the theologians are doing. But the CDF studied Father Sobrino's work for six years, during most of which time its head was the present Pope Benedict XVI, who is a vastly better theologian than Father Sobrino. Those who write for publication in effect ask to be judged by what they write, and if they think their work has been misunderstood they should simply clarify it, not cry foul.

Liberation Theology had its heyday around 1980, when its proponents tried to seize the religious and moral high ground by claiming to be advocates for the oppressed, the true modern followers of Jesus. As with all heresies, this claim required thinking that most professed Christians over the centuries had gotten it wrong, until people like Father Sobrino finally came along to straighten them out.

Liberation Theology also claimed to be "indigenous," growing out of the experiences of the oppressed, but that claim was also fallacious. Its roots were not in Latin America, where it attracted the greatest attention, but in certain kinds of typically abstract German theology, and Father Sobrino is himself an immigrant to El Salvador from Spain. Liberation Theology enjoyed a vogue in Western Europe and North America, but there is no evidence that its ideas ever had much popular support in Latin America itself, apart from a few highly publicized "base communities" that for the most part were not very influential or enduring.

There is also little evidence that the theology did much to alleviate oppression, nor could it. Understanding social and economic realities is not a theological task, although religion is the source of the moral judgments made about those realities. Liberation Theology claimed some practical relevance through various kinds of would-be revolutionary movements, none of which believed in the kind of "freedom" Father Sobrino now claims for himself, none of which were ever very effective, and none of which needed a coat of theological varnish in order to operate.

Father Sobrino's supporters charge that the Vatican's recent ruling is in reaction to his concern for the oppressed. But the Holy See made it quite clear that the problem is not there but in Father Sobrino's treatment of Christ and of the Church. He obscured the divinity of Christ and did not affirm that His death was the definitive act that saved humanity, seeing Him more as an example of social concern. His theology is "reductive," meaning that it achieved its emphasis on social justice by obscuring the supernatural heart of the Catholic faith.

Ironically, during the decades when Liberation Theology did enjoy a certain vogue, millions of Catholics in Latin America left the Church, not to join revolutionary movements but to become evangelical Protestants of one kind or another. Those who study this development judge that those who left the Church found in evangelicalism a direct, simple preaching of the Gospel that they were not getting from Catholics who seemed to offer an essentially political message.

If Father Sobrino deserves praise for his concerns about oppression, it is tragic that he tried to awaken people to that reality by radically deemphasizing the core meaning of their faith. In the end Liberation Theology was itself a kind of oppression, helping deprive the oppressed of their most precious possession, one that even the most tyrannical worldly regimes could never take from them.

(This article originally appeared on March 24, 2007, on the Women for Faith and Family website. It is reprinted by the kind permission of the author.)

Other columns by Dr. Hitchcock:

Fanatic Anti-Christianity
Our Enslavement to "Freedom"
Conscience and Chaos
Homosexual Orientation Is Not a "Gift"
The Divine Authority of Scripture vs. the "Hermeneutic of Suspicion"
Ordeal by Ideology: The Grilling of Judge Roberts
The Supreme Court's Penumbra of Politics
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger: Man for the Job
Confronting Modern Culture; Asserting the Gospel
Conservative Bishops, Liberal Results
Is Tolerance Intolerant?
The Myth of the Wall of Separation
The Church and the Media
Personally Opposed—To What?
Theory of the Enlightened Class

Dr. James Hitchcock, (e-mail) professor of history at St. Louis University, writes and lectures on contemporary Church matters. His column appears in the diocesan press, in the Adoremus Bulletin, and on the Women for Faith and Family website. He is the author of several books, including The Recovery of the Sacred, What is Secular Humanism?, and Years of Crisis: Collected Essays, 1970-1983.

Princeton University Press just published his two-volume history of the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court and Religion in American Life: The Odyssey of the Religion Clauses (Vol. 1) and From "Higher Law" to "Sectarian Scruples" (Vol. 2). He is also a regular contributor to many Catholic periodicals, including Catholic World Report.

If you'd like to receive the FREE e-letter (about every 1 to 2 weeks), which includes regular updates about articles, reviews, excerpts, and author appearances, please click here to sign-up today!

World Wide Web

Place your order toll-free at 1-800-651-1531

Ignatius Press | P.O. Box 1339 | Ft. Collins, CO 80522
Web design under direction of Ignatius Press.
Send your comments or web problems to:

Copyright 2016 by Ignatius Press catholic blog books insight scoop weblog ignatius