What Is the Magisterium? | Thomas Storck | IgnatiusInsight.com
What Is the Magisterium? | Thomas Storck
http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2007/tstorck_magisterium_may07.asp
The crisis that has afflicted the Catholic Church since
the middle of the 1960s has been a crisis of both faith and morals, that is, a
crisis that has made many Catholics no longer know what to believe or what kind
of conduct God expects of us. What is needed as a remedy for this is a firm
standard, a reliable guide or teacher who can tell us both what we must believe
and what we must do. And, of course, in Christ's true Church we do have such a
reliable standard and guide. But even Catholics of good will can sometimes be
confused about exactly which voices within the Church they are to follow.
In the past the average Catholic could depend on the word
of his parish priest if he had any doubts about correct Catholic belief or
conduct, or even on the example of the many good Catholics about him. But today
one can no longer trust everything that is said by just any priest or
theologian, and our fellow parishioners are likely to be totally confused about
what the Church proclaims to have been revealed by God. And so it behooves us
to understand a word and concept that is apt to be unfamiliar or confusing.
This word is Magisterium. Now the Latin
word magisterium originally meant
the duty or office of a teacher, tutor, master, etc. And in the case of the
Church it means simply the teaching authority or office of the Church. The Magisterium is the teaching office of the Church, accomplished
by the Holy Father and the bishops teaching in union with him.
The rule of what we must believe as Catholics was defined
by the First Vatican Council (1870) thus:
. . . Further, all those things are to be believed with
divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the Word of God, written or
handed down, and which the Church, either by a solemn judgment or by her
ordinary and universal teaching [magisterium], proposes for belief as having been divinely revealed. [1]
This quotation brings up several points that must be
explained. In the first place, the decree speaks of the "Word of God, written
or handed down," that is, recorded either in Sacred Scripture or in Sacred
Tradition. Now at first it might seem as if Sacred Scripture and Sacred
Tradition are two separate sources of divine revelation. But the Second Vatican
Council explained that in fact, "Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture make up
a single sacred deposit of the Word of God, which is entrusted to the Church."
[2] In other words, the truths which God has revealed to his Church come to us
through two modes, but they constitute
one body of truth, the Word of God. Therefore the Protestant practice of
equating the Word of God with only
the written Bible is an error. Moreover, as should be obvious from a little
reflection and historical knowledge, Sacred Scripture is itself a product of
the Church's thought and activity, and in this sense a product of Sacred
Tradition. This is true even though Scripture has God for its author and is
itself a mode of revelation, for the human authors of the New Testament wrote
from within the Church and took for granted the Church's teaching and worship
as they wrote.
The second point raised by the statement from the First
Vatican Council is the distinction between the Church's extraordinary
Magisterium and her ordinary and universal Magisterium, that is between what is
taught "by a solemn judgment or by her ordinary and universal teaching." Thus
the Magisterium operates via two methods. The solemn or extraordinary
Magisterium is seen in solemn definitions either by a pope, as for example, the
definition of the dogma of the Assumption of Mary into Heaven in 1950, or by
one of the Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church ratified by the pope, as
the definitions made by the Council of Trent (1545-1563) to reaffirm the
Catholic faith against the Protestants or the definition of papal infallibility
by the First Vatican Council in 1870.
The ordinary and universal Magisterium, on the other hand,
is the ordinary teaching of the Church, accomplished via papal pronouncements,
statements of bishops, catechisms, homilies, etc. This is not to say that
everything that any pope, bishop or priest has ever said on any occasion is
part of the ordinary and universal Magisterium, but that it is via such means
that this teaching is generally made known to the faithful. Note that the First
Vatican Council speaks of it as both "ordinary and universal." "Ordinary" means that it is accomplished via the
ordinary means of teaching that the Church uses, but "universal" means that it
is taught by the entire body of bishops, and usually over a period of time. For
generally when a doctrine has been taught as authoritative over time and by
many popes and bishops, this indicates that it is a teaching of the ordinary
and universal Magisterium and must be received and believed as faithfully as
teaching that is solemnly defined by pope or council. [3]
Much of the moral teaching of the Church is taught only by
this ordinary and universal Magisterium. For example, abortion. There can
obviously be no room for any legitimate dispute among Catholics about the moral
evil of abortion. Yet there has never been a solemn definition accompanied by
anathemas against this heinous practice. But there is no need for one, since
abortion has been condemned in numerous documents of the Church, starting with
the Didache, a very early Catholic
writing probably dating from between 80 to 90 A.D., and continuing on to the
numerous documents and sermons of John Paul II and of many other contemporary
bishops throughout the world. And whether or not the encyclical
Humanae Vitae of Paul VI (1968) was
infallible of itself, as some have argued, its teaching clearly was, for the
doctrine that contraceptive acts violate the natural law has always been taught
in the Church. Thus Catholics must reject any minimalist understanding of
doctrine that would reduce it to only those pronouncements that have been
solemnly made.
Moreover, we must distinguish the "ordinary and
universal Magisterium" from simply "the
ordinary Magisterium." This latter is authoritatively discussed in the
encyclical Humani Generis of Pius
XII (1950) and the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium, of the Second Vatican Council (1964). Pope Pius XII
wrote,
. . . Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in
Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent, since in writing such . .
. not exercise the supreme power of their Teaching Authority [Magisterium]. For
these matters are taught with the ordinary teaching authority [Magisterio enim
ordinario haec docentur], of which it is true to say: "He who heareth you, . .
. heareth me" . . . [4]
And Lumen Gentium teaches:
Bishops who teach in communion with the Roman Pontiff are
to be revered by all as witnesses of divine and Catholic truth; the faithful,
for their part, are obliged to submit to their bishops' decision, made in the
name of Christ, in matters of faith and morals, and to adhere to it with a
ready and respectful allegiance of mind. This loyal submission of the will and
intellect must be given, in a special way, to the authentic teaching authority
of the Roman Pontiff, even when he does not speak ex cathedra in such wise, indeed, that his supreme teaching
authority be acknowledged with respect, and sincere assent be given to
decisions made by him, conformably with his manifest mind and intention, which
is made known principally either by the character of the documents in question,
or by the frequency with which a certain doctrine is proposed, or by the manner
in which the doctrine is formulated. [5]
In this case the Magisterium is ordinary but not
universal. Even so, it demands a "loyal submission of the will and intellect"
on the part of the whole Church. It must be emphasized, though, that when this
passage refers to bishops, it is speaking only about those bishops "who teach
in communion with the Roman Pontiff."
Finally, in its definition that I quoted above, the First
Vatican Council is looking at the Magisterium chiefly in its historical
working, that is, over the centuries the Church has proposed certain things
which must be held as of faith. But another aspect of the Magisterium was
further highlighted by the Second Vatican Council in 1965, namely its function
of giving ongoing guidance and interpretation of doctrine to the faithful. "But
the task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in
its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living,
teaching office of the Church alone." [6] In other words, the Magisterium can
be looked at as both the accumulated tradition of its acts and decrees through
the ages as well as a living voice, capable of responding to new issues that
arise and deciding definitively about points of doctrine, as necessary for the
welfare of the people of God. But in doing so, the Magisterium does not invent
new doctrines, for "this Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is
its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it." [7]
Moreover, as we saw, the teaching of the Magisterium
extends to matters of both faith and
morals. "The ordinary and universal Magisterium of the Pope and the bishops in
communion with him teach the faithful the truth to believe, the charity to
practice, the beatitude to hope for" (CCC 2034). Thus the Church's Magisterium
guides our conduct and even the conduct of society as a whole.
To the Church belongs the right always and everywhere to
announce moral principles, including those pertaining to the social order, and
to make judgments on any human affairs to the extent that they are required by
the fundamental rights of the human person or the salvation of souls (CCC
2032).
Some Catholics object when the Church makes statements
which they think tend to interfere with their conduct in society, especially on
economic matters. But, in fact, the Church has always done this,
not
indeed in technical matters, for which she has neither the equipment nor the
mission, but in all those that have a bearing on moral conduct. For the deposit
of truth entrusted to Us by God, and Our weighty office of propagating, interpreting
and urging in season and out of season the entire moral law, demand that both
social and economic questions be brought within Our supreme jurisdiction, in so
far as they refer to moral issues.
For, though economic activity and moral discipline are guided
each by its own principles in its own sphere, it is false that the two orders
are so distinct and alien that the former in no way depends on the latter. [8]
It is only on the moral aspects of economic activity that
the Church pronounces, but when she does so, Catholics are as bound to obey her
voice as on matters pertaining to the truths of faith or to purely individual
moral conduct.
There remain two additional matters to take up in this
discussion of the Magisterium of the Church. The first is the question of
private revelations. Private revelations, real or spurious, have a more
important place in Catholic life today than formerly. On one hand, we have
private revelations, such as Lourdes or Fátima, which have been approved by the
Church and which offer to the faithful both concrete physical help (such as the
many healings at Lourdes) and beneficial spiritual guidance (such as the many
directions for our spiritual life given at Fátima). This is all to the good.
Genuine private revelations always point in some way toward the central truths
of the Faith. But the multiplication of private revelations that have not been
approved by the Church, and especially those that have been condemned by her,
can distract from the message of the Gospel. And even at their best, private
revelations "do not belong . . . to the deposit of faith. It is not their role
to improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help live more
fully by it in a certain period of history" (CCC 67). As long as we keep to those
private revelations only on which the Church has bestowed her approval and
cultivate our devotion according to the mind of the Church, then these
revelations can have a good effect on our Christian life and foster our piety,
especially our love for the Blessed Mother of God.
One reason spurious private revelations have become so
common in the Church is the doctrinal confusion following the Second Vatican
Council. Many of the faithful who are not well instructed are attracted to
anything which seems holy and traditional in the face of the widespread dissent
among the clergy. This leads to my last topic, for sometimes this dissent and
disobedience have been justified by the assertion that there is a magisterium
of theologians parallel to the Magisterium of the pope and bishops, and that
this magisterium of the theologians may rightly teach things contrary to what
is taught by the hierarchical Magisterium. But this is not true. Although
theologians have a very important place in the Church, and although great
freedom of discussion must be allotted to anyone seeking to probe faithfully
the mysteries of the Faith, this freedom must always be within the bounds of
revealed doctrine as defined by the official Magisterium. There is no right of
dissent from Catholic doctrine, including the teaching of the ordinary
Magisterium. [9] Catholicism is not a religion in which a cadre of select
initiates passes on secret doctrines while the majority of the faithful adheres
to the public revelation of the Church. Although obviously one versed in
theology and philosophy will have a deeper understanding of the truths of the
Faith than other Catholics, all Catholics, whether clergy or lay, scholar or
peasant, must believe the same things and observe the same commandments, if they
hope to reach Heaven. [10]
The importance of the Magisterium is in fact the
importance of our life as Christians. What is the good news which Jesus Christ
has entrusted to His Church for our salvation? What is the saving faith which
we need in order to attain eternal life? It is only because of the Magisterium,
the teaching office and authority of the Church, that Catholics can know what
they must believe and do, and thus live a life pleasing to Almighty God, in
order to obtain eternal salvation.
ENDNOTES:
[1] Dogmatic Constitution, De Fide, chap. 3.
[2] Dogmatic Constitution, Dei Verbum, 10.
[3] The Second Vatican Council in the Dogmatic
Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium,
no. 25, taught, "Although the bishops, taken individually, do not enjoy the
privilege of infallibility, they do, however, proclaim infallibly the doctrine
of Christ on the following conditions: namely, when, even though dispersed
throughout the world but preserving for all that amongst themselves and with
Peter's successor the bond of communion, in their authoritative teaching
concerning matters of faith or morals, they are in agreement that a particular
teaching is to be held definitively and absolutely."
[4] No. 20.
[5] No. 25.
[6] Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation, Dei
Verbum, 10.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Pius XI, encyclical Quadragesimo Anno, 41, 42 (Paulist translation).
[9] See the Apostolic Letter, Ad Tuendam Fidem, of Pope John Paul II (May 28, 1998) and the Commentary
on the Concluding Formula of the 'Professio Fidei' issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (June 29,
1998). In addition to making clear that there is no right of dissent, both
these documents discuss the different ways the Church exercises her teaching
authority, such as the extraordinary Magisterium, the ordinary and universal
Magisterium and "the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of
Bishops enunciate when they exercise their authentic Magisterium, even if they
do not intend to proclaim these teachings by a definitive act."
[10] Although usually a greater academic knowledge of
theology and philosophy will result in a more profound grasp of the Faith, this
is not always the case. God is able to illuminate the mind of one who has
little academic knowledge with a deeper understanding of the mysteries of the
Faith than can be gained by study alone.
This article originally appeared in the July/August 2001
issue of Catholic Faith magazine.
Related IgnatiusInsight.com Articles
• On the Papacy, John Paul II, and the Nature of the Church |
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
• Peter and Succession | Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
• "Primacy in Love": The Chair Altar of Saint Peter's in Rome | Joseph
Cardinal Ratzinger
• St. Peter and the Primacy of Rome | Stephen K. Ray
• Church Authority and the Petrine Element | Hans Urs von Balthasar
• The Papacy and Ecumenism | Rev. Adriano Garuti, O.F.M.
• The Church Is the Goal of All Things | Christoph Cardinal Schönborn
• Motherhood of the Entire Church | Henri de Lubac
• Excerpts from Theology of the Church | Charles Cardinal Journet
• Authority and Dissent in the Catholic Church | Dr. William E. May
• Exploring the Catholic Faith! | An Interview with Diane Eriksen
• Understanding The Hierarchy of Truths | Douglas Bushman, S.T.L.
Thomas Storck, who writes from Maryland, received an M.L.S. degree
from Louisiana State University and an M.A. from St. John's College in Santa
Fe, New Mexico. He is the author of The Catholic Milieu (Christendom
Press, 1987), Foundations of a Catholic Political Order (1998), Christendom
and the West (2000) and of numerous articles and reviews on Catholic
culture and social teaching.
If you'd like to receive the FREE IgnatiusInsight.com e-letter (about
every 1 to 2 weeks), which includes regular updates about IgnatiusInsight.com
articles, reviews, excerpts, and author appearances,
please click here to sign-up today!